
What is a State Run Retirement Plan?
State Run Retirement Plan are individual “cash balance” accounts where benefits at retirement are based solely on contributions and returns. A cash balance plan is an already-existing type of defined benefit pension plan that incorporates some features of a defined contribution plan. The State Run Retirement Plann major features are:
- Consistent contributions: as in a 401(k)-type plan, workers and/or their employers would contribute at least 3 percent of pay into their individual State Plan
- Guaranteed returns: each account would be guaranteed to earn a return of at least 3%, or about 1% above inflation. This guarantee ensures that funds are protected from the volatility of the stock market; workers do not have to worry about losing a significant portion of their savings right before retirement.
- Pooled investments: All individual account assets would be invested together in one large pool, with an emphasis on low-risk, long-term gains. Pooling takes advantage of economies of scale and minimizes financial risks.
- Portable accounts: Individual Accounts would be portable; the account would automatically move with a worker from job to job, unlike 401(k)s, which are tied to a particular job and difficult to roll over.
- Lifelong retirement income: at retirement, workers would convert all or part of their State Plan balance into an annuity—a guaranteed stream of income for life—to ensure that they do not outlive their savings.
Investment management costs could be minimized by using the already-existing public pension infrastructure to invest the funds. State pension funds, which operate on a not-for-profit basis, have highly skilled, professional investment managers and administrators that are charged with overseeing and investing more than $3.1 trillion in retirement savings.8 In such an arrangement, assets in State Plan would be kept in a separate investment pool from public pension fund assets.
Why is a State Run Retirement Plan a Better Retirement Plan than a 401(k)?
The 401(k) system is inherently inefficient because it generates high administrative and investment management costs that are ultimately absorbed by the workers themselves.9 401(k)s also expose workers to a host of risks:10
- Market risk: workers who have 401(k)s risk losing a chunk of their savings in a market downturn, a particularly damaging prospect for workers nearing retirement.
- Longevity risk: retirees relying on their 401(k) to supplement Social Security may outlive their savings.
- Investment risk: 401(k)s force workers to manage their own portfolios, which often leads to lower-than-optimal performance for many reasons: workers sell losing investments while holding winning investments, tend to hold un-diversified portfolios, are invested in too many high-risk stocks, and generally lack the expertise necessary to earn high returns.
- Contribution risk: workers often contribute too little or too inconsistently to their accounts to accumulate a sufficient nest egg. High account fees can exacerbate this problem, taking a big bite out of already-inadequate savings.
- Leakage risk: workers often whittle away their savings by cashing out assets when they change jobs, by borrowing from their 401(k)s, and by making hardship withdrawals from their accounts before retirement.
These risks and costs are an inherent part of the 401(k) system. Thus, reforms like stricter regulations on brokers, disclosure of 401(k) fees, or requiring plan sponsors to offer more lower-cost index funds, would be band-aids; they wouldn’t fix this fundamentally broken system. Fees would still remain high and workers would still be forced to shoulder most of the risks.
On the other hand, the State Plan would encourage workers to save consistently, and their hard-earned savings would be invested in financial vehicles that charge low fees and provide steady returns. At retirement, their nest egg would be converted into a low-cost annuity to ensure that they have a guaranteed stream of income for the rest of their lives.
What is the Guaranteed Minimum Rate of Return?
The guaranteed minimum rate of return is one of the defining characteristics of the State Plan. It ensures that at retirement, savers receive a benefit that includes the total amount of funds they deposited into their account over their work life plus at least some annual minimum rate of return on their assets.
This minimum guarantee insures workers against the possibility of losing a significant portion of their hard-earned savings during bad economic times while also allowing them to capture higher investment returns when the market is performing well. Even in a year of poor investment returns, participants would be guaranteed at least a 3% rate of return on their investments, or 1% after adjusting for inflation. However, in high-performing years participants would receive additional returns, projected to be as high as 7% (5% after adjusting for inflation). To enable the fund to meet its 3% guarantee in low-earning years, some of the investment earnings in excess of the guarantee would also be deposited into a “rainy day fund”.
This is not a radical idea: TIAA-CREF, one of the largest investment firms in the country, has offered a similar fund, their TIAA Traditional Annuity Fund, to non-profit workers and teachers for over 80 years.
DEMOS – State Guaranteed Retirement Accounts
Solutions:
- create a state retirement plan to similar to Seattle’s Retirement Savings Plan
- Create a retirement plan for Texas non-profits similar to Massachusetts
- Create retirement plan for private sector employers similar to the federal program my RA
- Create a retirement plan for private sector employers similar to Illinois’s Secure Choice Savings Program
- Create a state retirement plan similar to California’s Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program
- Create a state retirement plan similar to New Jersey’s New Jersey Secure Choice Savings Program Act
- create a state retirement plan to similar to Washington’s Small Business Retirement Marketplace
Alternatives:
- Let private sector employees buy into the federal retirement system, Thrift Savings Plan
- Let private sector employees buy into the Employee Retirement System used by Texas legislators
Time – Why California’s New Retirement Savings Plan May Become a National Model
Aspen Institute – Comment Letter: Proposed ERISA Safe Harbor for State Savings Arrangements
17 States Considering State-Run Retirement Plans Aimed at Private Sector Workers
NCSL – State Sponsored Retirement Savings Plans for Non-Public Employees
NCSL – Illinois Pioneers State-run Retirement Plan for Private Sector Workers
FORBES – Retirement Plans At Every Employer! Is Your State Next?
WSJ – States Tackle America’s Retirement-Savings Shortfall
WSJ – One Fix for the American Nest Egg: Make People Save
CBS – The plan that could render your 401(k) obsolete
Maryland bill for state-run private-sector retirement plan heads to governor
Frustrated states push to fill retirement void
State-based retirement plans for the private sector
AARP – State Retirement Savings Resource Center
AARP – Giving Small Businesses a Competitive Edge: The California Retirement Savings Plan
AARP – Investment Platform: The Advantages of Placing Retirement Savings Assets in Pooled Accounts
AARP – Consumer Protections in State-Sponsored Retirement Plans for Private-Sector Workers
AARP – Georgia Announces Introduction of Retirement Security Bill
AARP Survey: Two-Thirds of California Small Business Owners Support Retirement Savings Program
State private retirement programs get help from president
Clarity on state-run private-sector retirement savings coming by year-end
Frustrated states push to fill retirement void
Are Rubio’s retirement reforms right?
FORBES – A Simple Way To Save For Retirement
State run Retirement Plan for Private Sector by State
GAO – Federal Action Could Help State Efforts to Expand Private Sector Coverage
Telegraph – Ten countries with the world’s best pension systems
The Christian Science Monitor – Europe’s 5 most generous pension systems
New York Times – No Smoke, No Mirrors: The Dutch Pension Plan
New York Times – A Smarter Plan to Make Retirement Savings Last
New York Times – Pushing Aside 401(k)’s for Mandatory Savings Plans
New York Times – New Jersey’s Private-Sector Retirement Plan Moves Forward
New York Times – New Jersey Creates Retirement Savings Plan, Modified by Christie
New York Times – More States Are Initiating Programs to Encourage Retirement Savings
New York Times – Illinois Introduces Automatic Retirement Savings Program, a First for the Nation
New York Times – Obama Orders Creation of ‘MyRA’ Savings Accounts
New York Times – U.S. Offers Account to Encourage Retirement Saving
New York Times – A Smarter Plan to Make Retirement Savings Last
New York Times – From California, a Better Way to Retire
BBC – Going Dutch: What is a collective pension scheme?
Brookings – Are new directions needed in state retirement policy?
Wall Street Journal – Oregon Is Latest State to Tackle Retirement Savings Crisis
INSEAD – Sharing Risks in Collective Funded Pensions requires Credibility
Saga Magazine – What’s a collective pension scheme?
The Guardian – Q&A: Collective pension schemes and how they work
Boston Globe – Galvin backs bill to require state-run pension as option
N.J. Moves Toward State-Run Retirement Plan for Private Sector
N.J. Assembly agrees to Christie’s changes on private-sector retirement plan
RSA – Collective Pensions in the UK
Optimal risk sharing in a collective define contribution pension system
Truth Out – Half of US Workforce Has No Retirement Plan – but Illinois Has a Fix
U.S. News – State-Run IRAs May Offer a New Retirement Plan Option
BNY Mellon – Pooling the UK Local Government Pension Scheme
Investment and Pensions Europe – German SMEs shifting towards collective pension schemes – study
Chicago Tribune – Illinois governor signs small-business retirement plan bill into law
The Secure Choice Savings Program: Illinois’s Solution to Retirement Insecurity
Bell Policy Center – Colorado Secure Savings Plan
Economic Policy Institute – The Myth of Early Retirement
Economic Policy Institute- California retirement plan could serve as a national model
Economic Policy Institute – Toward a universal, secure, and adequate retirement system
Economic Policy Institute- Guaranteed retirement accounts
Economic Policy Institute- Private-sector pension coverage fell by half over two decades
Demos – The Retirement Savings Drain: Hidden & Excessive Costs of 401(k)s
State of Connecticut Retirement Security Board
USA Today – Iowa Treasurer proposes state run retirement savings plan
LA Times – How severe is the retirement crisis? These six charts spell it out.
Syracuse Public Media – State-Facilitated Retirement Savings Plan Could be included in NYS Budget
Philly.com – N.J. blazes a trail on retirement saving
A Bill to Let Workers Save Like Members of Congress
Washington Post – Rubio, retirement benefits and a Thrift Savings Plan for all Americans
Sacramento Bee – State-managed retirement plan for California workers takes shape
NBC – Is Your State Getting Into the Retirement Business?
Maryland bill for state-run private-sector retirement plan heads to governor
AARP Connecticut – Don’t believe the Myths. Get the Facts
Buffalo News – Another Voice: Bad investment advice costs retirees billions of dollars
LA Times – Los Angeles has one of the lowest rates of access to retirement plans
United Kingdom – National Employment Savings Trust
Pew – How States Are Working to Address The Retirement Savings Challenge
Pew – How States Are Working to Address the Retirement Savings Challenge
The Nation – Inequality Has Gotten So Bad That We’re Offshoring Our Grandparents
Huffington Post – President Obama Just Made It Easier For States To Help Workers Retire
Bloomberg – State-Run Retirement Plans Made Easier Under New Obama Rules